Where the literature has put ultrafine bubbles into a process line.
Concrete, dairy concentrate, wafer cleaning, biodiesel, cooling towers. What published work reports, what mechanism is doing it, and where our hardware would sit. None of it is our own measurement, and we say so on every figure.
(no added admixture · published research)
(protein concentrate · published research)
(H₂ bubbles in diesel · published research)
Where it works
Published research has put ultrafine bubbles into each of these processes. Here is what it reports, and where the hardware would sit.
Food & beverage
In published work, CO₂ ultrafine bubbles raised ice-cream overrun and cut milk-concentrate viscosity 65–80%.
Construction
Higher compressive strength (+6–13% in published work) and CO₂ bound in the matrix during curing.
Precision cleaning
Remove nanoscale particles from silicon wafers with far less cleaning chemistry, in published work.
Biofuels & energy
Cavitation accelerates transesterification for biodiesel production, in published work.
Thermal management
Slow scale formation in cooling towers and thin thermal boundary layers, in published work.
Have a process line where this could apply?
Tell us what the line does and what it costs to run. We will map the published work onto it and say plainly where our hardware would sit — and where it would not.
Ask for a worked analysisWhat process engineers ask before a worked analysis
Which processes does this apply to?
The ones published research has put ultrafine bubbles into: dairy concentrate and ice cream, concrete batching and curing, precision cleaning of wafers and membranes, biodiesel transesterification, and cooling-tower scale control. If your line isn't on that list, tell us what it does and we will say whether the published work reaches it.
Are any of these figures yours?
No. Every figure on this page is published research — concrete strength +6–13% and milk-concentrate viscosity down 65–80%, for example, were measured on other people's mixes and concentrates. None of it is our own measurement, and we say so on every figure.
How is a project scoped?
Case by case, with a worked analysis rather than a calculator. Tell us what the line does and what it costs to run; we map the published work onto it and say plainly where our hardware would sit — the batch water feed, the concentrate line ahead of the dryer, a make-up or recirculation line — and where it would not.
What would a trial on our line look like?
Treated against untreated on the same line, with a baseline captured first and the success criteria agreed in writing before anything ships. The measurement is the property the published work reports — compressive strength, viscosity, scale formation — taken on your material rather than ours. You get a written results report, baseline against treated, and you decide whether to scale.
What does the site need to provide?
A dedicated GFCI-protected circuit, with the exact voltage and amperage specified in your proposal, access to the water line at the injection point, and a mounting area for the skid. The equipment mounts inline on existing piping, so installation usually takes one to three days.
What the research says, and what we build
Each problem below is paired with the published work on it and with the hardware that puts the mechanism in your line. Figures are other people's trials unless marked KST field data.
Figures below are from independent, peer-reviewed studies unless marked KST field data.