Reading mode

Cavitation, gas dissolution and fine bubbles

How does a Venturi or cavitation device pull gas into water, break it into fine bubbles, and decide whether the gas dissolves or escapes?

KairospaceUpdated 8 min readPeer-reviewed research

On this page
  1. Key takeaways
  2. How a Venturi draws in gas
  3. How shear breaks gas into micro- and nanobubbles
  4. Pressure recovery and dissolution
  5. Measured oxygen transfer
  6. Degassing versus dissolving
  7. Where this leads
  8. What this means in practice
  9. Limits and open questions
  10. Questions
  11. References

How a Venturi draws in gas

A Venturi aerates without a compressor. Water speeds up through the throat and its pressure falls, by Bernoulli's principle Zheng et al., 2022. Even a small pressure difference between inlet and outlet produced suction at holes in the throat; the air injection rate depended on the flow's Reynolds number (a measure of turbulence), the air-hole and inlet diameters, and the pipe downstream Baylar et al., 2007.

Orifice-type generators work the same way. In one design, the pressure just downstream of the orifice turned negative and drew air in through a porous pipe Sadatomi et al., 2012. The pump that drives the water supplies all the energy.

How shear breaks gas into micro- and nanobubbles

The flow tears the incoming gas apart. In the orifice generator, high shear and strong turbulence broke the drawn-in air into a very large number of microbubbles. More than 70% of the measured bubbles were smaller than 0.1 mm (bubbles under 0.01 mm could not be measured). At 1.0 L/min of air, the mean diameter was about 0.12 mm. Producing microbubbles alone required a mean water velocity through the orifice above about 10 m/s Sadatomi et al., 2012.

Cavitation devices can also leave nanobubbles, smaller than 1 µm. A Venturi-type device recirculating water at 2 to 5 bar for 5 to 20 minutes produced bulk nanobubbles with mean diameters of 180 to 210 nm; a sample made in 15 minutes at 3 bar persisted for 72 hours Li et al., 2021. In a self-aspirating Venturi, freshly treated water was milky with microbubbles; on standing, they coalesced, rose and burst within minutes, and the water cleared Zhou et al., 2022. Why nanobubbles persist, and how to tell them from microbubbles, is covered in Generation mechanisms and stability and Nanobubbles vs. microbubbles.

Pressure recovery and dissolution

Downstream of the throat, the pressure recovers suddenly Zheng et al., 2022. Bubbles carried on are now at a higher pressure, which favors dissolution. By , the equilibrium ratio between a gas's abundance in the gas phase and in the water is constant for a dilute solution Sander, 2023, so more gas dissolves at a higher partial pressure, whether from pressure recovery or tank depth. Fine bubbles also offer a large gas–liquid interface and rise slowly, which lengthens contact time. How interface, bubble size and contact time set the transfer coefficient () is covered in Diffusion and gas–liquid mass transfer.

Only part of the gas dissolved in the one generator that measured it: 25 to 30% of the oxygen supplied, roughly independent of air flow and generator type, in a 1.2 m deep tank of tap water at 20 °C Sadatomi et al., 2012.

Measured oxygen transfer

Two measures answer different questions. Standard oxygen transfer efficiency () is the share of supplied oxygen that dissolves. Standard aeration efficiency (SAE) is the oxygen dissolved per kilowatt-hour of power, pump included.

Modules of Venturi air injectors tested in water reached values of 9.67 and 5.93 h⁻¹ for two- and three-injector parallel modules, against 3.63 to 4.54 h⁻¹ in series, and aeration efficiencies of 0.10 to 0.14 kg O₂/kWh in parallel against 0.06 to 0.07 in series Zhu et al., 2007. A 1.1 kW submersible pump with a Venturi injector reached 1.166 kg O₂/kWh at its best setting (14 mm nozzle, 60 cm depth, 45° angle); nozzle diameter made a significant difference, depth and angle did not Ghomi et al., 2009. The studies used different pumps and tanks, so these figures do not rank designs.

At pilot scale, an HC setup with a 1.86 m³ open tank, treating sedimented municipal wastewater at 23 °C, raised dissolved oxygen () from 4.5 to 8 mg/L within 4 minutes; DO then held between 7.02 and 7.86 mg/L to the end of the 24-minute run Janetasari & Bokányi, 2026.

Pump power decides the comparison. At full scale, jet aerators in thick digester sludge failed their standard tests by substantial margins. They transferred a similar share of oxygen as coarse-bubble diffusers, but the diffusers had substantially higher aeration efficiency once the jet pump's power was counted, and fine bubbles coalesced in the thick sludge Steele et al., 2023.

Degassing versus dissolving

The low pressure that draws gas in can also pull gas out of solution. In a Venturi tunnel with controlled air content, large cavities were mostly water vapor, but the share of dissolved air diffusing into them rose as they shrank, and dissolved air left more gas bubbles behind after collapse Tian et al., 2025. Whether that gas redissolves or escapes depends on the pressure and contact time downstream.

Held at low pressure, a Venturi can degas water almost completely. A Venturi-nozzle bubbler in a vessel kept at 1 kPa, without heating, brought dissolved oxygen in 360 to 400 L of tap water close to zero Jun, 2023.

One study saw both directions. In 1 L of ultrapure water, a self-aspirating Venturi raised DO from about 8.5 mg/L to a peak of 11.3 to 11.8 mg/L at about 100 seconds, after which DO fell gradually while the device kept running; the water warmed by under 1.5 °C, too little to explain the fall. DO rose and fell in step with the number of microbubbles, the peak was lower when the added air flow exceeded 10 mL/min, and DO dropped again on standing as the microbubbles vanished Zhou et al., 2022. Water above saturation () tends to lose the excess, as explained in How gases dissolve in water and Water as a gas carrier.

Where this leads

Cavitation is one of the main ways fine bubbles are made, and the Micro- and nanobubbles course starts from there with Generation mechanisms and stability. How industries use cavitation and the gas it carries is covered lesson by lesson in agriculture, aquaculture, water treatment, mining and energy.

What this means in practice

To tell dissolved gas from bubbles, measure DO in mg/L and as % saturation, with temperature, at the device outlet and at the point of use, after visible bubbles have cleared and again over time; in one study, DO readings tracked microbubbles and fell as they vanished Zhou et al., 2022. Milky water shows microbubbles, not dissolved oxygen. Log pump power, air flow, inlet and outlet pressure and water volume so that transfer can be expressed as SAE as well as SOTE, and run a control without air injection. Characterize any nanobubbles with the controls in Characterization and measurement. Compare devices in the water, and at the scale, where they will be used Steele et al., 2023.

Limits and open questions

  • Most figures come from small volumes of tap or ultrapure water. The one wastewater pilot is known from its abstract, which does not describe the device or its air supply.
  • The Venturi aeration efficiencies come from different pumps, tanks and layouts and cannot rank designs against each other.
  • The one full-scale test concerned jet aerators in thick sludge, not cavitation devices in clean water.
  • The 25 to 30% dissolution figure was measured for one orifice-type generator.

Questions

Does a Venturi need a compressor?

No. As water flows through a Venturi, the pressure at the throat falls and air is drawn in through holes there; even a small pressure difference between inlet and outlet produced suction. The pump supplies the energy, so its power belongs in any efficiency comparison.

Why did dissolved oxygen fall while the device was still running?

In one study with a self-aspirating Venturi, oxygen rose above its starting level within about 100 seconds, then fell with the number of microbubbles. Water above saturation tends to lose its excess gas, and low pressure in a cavitation zone can pull dissolved gas into bubbles that escape.

Is milky water a sign of high dissolved oxygen?

No. Milkiness comes from microbubbles, which are undissolved gas; in one study they rose, burst and cleared within minutes. Dissolved oxygen has to be measured with a meter after the bubbles clear. In one orifice generator, only 25 to 30% of the oxygen supplied actually dissolved.

How should two aeration devices be compared?

In the same water, at a realistic scale, on oxygen dissolved per kilowatt-hour, pump included. At full scale, jet aerators transferred a similar share of oxygen as coarse-bubble diffusers but were less efficient once pump power was counted. Measured Venturi efficiencies ranged from 0.06 to 1.166 kg O₂/kWh.

References

  1. Sadatomi, M., Kawahara, A., Matsuura, H., et al. (2012). Micro-bubble generation rate and bubble dissolution rate into water by a simple multi-fluid mixer with orifice and porous tube. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 41, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2012.03.002 ↩
  2. Li, T., Cui, Z., Sun, J., et al. (2021). Generation of Bulk Nanobubbles by Self-Developed Venturi-Type Circulation Hydrodynamic Cavitation Device. Langmuir, 37, 12952-12960. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02010 ↩
  3. Zhou, S., Nazari, S., Hassanzadeh, A., et al. (2022). The effect of preparation time and aeration rate on the properties of bulk micro-nanobubble water using hydrodynamic cavitation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 84, 105965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.105965 ↩
  4. J. Zhu, C. F. Miller, C. Dong, et al. (2007). Aerator Module Development Using Venturi Air Injectors to Improve Aeration Efficiency. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 23, 661-667. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.23667 ↩
  5. Ghomi, M., Sohrabnejad, M., Ovissipour, M. R. (2009). An experimental study of nozzle diameters, aeration depths and angles on standard aeration efficiency (SAE) in a venturi aerator. Water Practice and Technology, 4, wpt2009043. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2009.043 ↩
  6. Jun, Y. D. (2023). Degassing Dissolved Oxygen through Bubbling: The Contribution and Control of Vapor Bubbles. Processes, 11, 3158. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11113158 ↩
  7. Zheng, H., Zheng, Y., Zhu, J. (2022). Recent Developments in Hydrodynamic Cavitation Reactors: Cavitation Mechanism, Reactor Design, and Applications. Engineering, 19, 180-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.04.027 ↩
  8. Baylar, A., Ozkan, F., Unsal, M. (2007). On the Use of Venturi Tubes in Aeration. CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water, 35, 183-185. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.200600025 ↩
  9. Sander, R. (2023). Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 5.0.0) for water as solvent. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23, 10901-12440. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10901-2023 ↩
  10. Janetasari, S. A., Bokányi, L. (2026). Dissolved oxygen analysis in hydrodynamic cavitation pre-treatment for enhanced biological decomposition of sedimented municipal wastewater. Heliyon, 12, e45237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2026.e45237 ↩
  11. Steele, P., Warner, R., Rosso, D. (2023). Oxygen transfer comparison of jets and coarse bubble aeration in concentrated sludge. Water Environment Research, 95, e10869. https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.10869 ↩
  12. Tian, X., Li, Z., Qian, Z. (2025). Effect of dissolved air content on attached cavitation in a Venturi section. Physics of Fluids, 37, 013355. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0249229 ↩

What changed: New lesson. (Updated )

This lesson summarizes published research for educational purposes. Results reported in studies depend on their conditions and may not reproduce at your site. Nothing here is a performance guarantee or a recommendation for a specific installation.

Cite this lesson

Kairospace Technologies. “Cavitation, gas dissolution and fine bubbles.” Kairospace Classroom, Sep 2026. https://kairospacetech.com/classroom/cavitation-gas-transfer.html